CIPPIC Takes Apple to Competition Tribunal Over Alleged Anti-Competitive App Store Practices

The Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) has applied to the Competition Tribunal to bring a case against Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Inc., alleging that the tech giant has abused its dominant position in the Canadian mobile app market. This legal action seeks to address practices that CIPPIC argues stifle innovation and inflate costs for both consumers and developers.

The Allegations: Anti-Competitive Practices

The application, brought under the “public interest” provision of Canada’s Competition Act, targets Apple’s "walled garden" ecosystem. CIPPIC argues that Apple maintains an unfair monopoly over app distribution and in-app payment services on iOS devices through restrictive, non-negotiable contracts.

Specific practices CIPPIC is asking the Tribunal to prohibit include:

• Exclusive Dealing: Forcing developers to use the Apple App Store exclusively, which forecloses all competition for app distribution on iPhones and iPads.

• Tied Selling: Mandating the use of Apple’s In-App Payment (IAP) system, allowing the company to collect a standard 30% commission on digital purchases.

• Anti-Steering Rules: Preventing developers from telling Canadian users about cheaper payment options available outside of the App Store.

• Excessive Pricing: Charging "supra-competitive" commissions that are not justified by the actual costs of operating the store or maintaining security.

This intervention follows similar regulatory and judicial actions against Apple in other countries. 

Next Steps in the Legal Process

On January 2, 2026, the Competition Tribunal determined it has the authority to decide whether CIPPIC should be granted “leave” (permission) to proceed with this application. Under the Tribunal’s Rules, Apple has 15 days to respond to the filing.

CIPPIC is being represented in this matter by Sotos LLP, a firm recognized for its expertise in complex litigation and competition law.

Documents:

• CIPPIC v Apple, Notice of Applicaton